Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
This isn't rocket science Jim, the CT departments of education and health reviewed the CDC guidance and determined largely because of Delta and the rapidly raising infections among the young that masks should be worn in schools regardless of vaccination status. The Gov signed the order based on their feedback. There isn't any more to it than that, no grand conspiracy to strip kids of their liberties.
|
i understand the logic behind wanted kids to wear masks.
But what data can you point me to, which says that those entertainers in California, are meangfully lower risk
than kids who are similarly vaccinated and who similarly have a negative test.
i know, you’re not this stupid. you’re dancing around the only thing that matters.
By what logic do we give more freedoms to entertainers in California than to people
who work in another industry in california, or to children?
my kids are required to socially distance, and to wear masks. those entertainers are not.
Why? if there’s data to suggest that the virus differentiates between actors and everyone else, I’ll happily concede the point.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device