11-15-2021, 08:19 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,184
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
ok, on many TV stations, and God knows how many blogs,, and even among a few of you here, I was told that Rittenhouse wasn’t legally allowed to be holding that rifle.
It’s all bullsh*t. Wisconsin law explicitly states that he was legally allowed to be in possession of that rifle, at that time, at that age. There was no crime.
No one bothered to read Wisconsin state law before they concluded he broke the law.
|
Mostly wrong.
|
|
|
|