Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Oh I have.. and he has completely ignored all the evidence presented
According to Jim the kid is not responsible for his actions nothing he’s just a poor victim. And did nothing wrong..
Who should be seen as a law enforcement officer who has experience and trained in these situations
And was justified because he thought he was going to be killed or he thought they were going to take his gun and use it on Him .. Bla bla bla
Like I’ve said you start a fight and start losing . You cannot decide to suddenly claim self defense
The kid thought the Ar 15 gave him the power of intimidation. Why else would a 17 year we walking around solo in that environment
Being Immature didn’t help.
And I am not saying this kid went with a plan to shoot 3 people
but he went with the mindset he was willing to use his weapon and show those s people what’s what ..
It had nothing to do with with his desire to carry out some civic duty
As some have suggested
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
again, you’re either very stupid or very much a liar.
he’s responsible for his actions. but he doesn’t get convicted, unless he broke the law. that’s how it works.
“nothing to do with his desire to carry out some civic duty.”
must be nice being a mind reader. we are all shocked that your wild speculation here, supports the liberal narrative.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device