Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
but did you?
|
In the occasions he posted about, Sen Paul voted for the original relief. Then when congress debated additional relief later on, Sen Paul wanted it paid for, that’s all.
When it happened in KY, Paul voted voted for the original
relief, just as he had done before.
Now if congress debates additional relief later on, and Paul votes for it without demanding that it be laid for, that would be hypocritical.
This assumes that the article i posted, is accurate. if those are indeed the facts, there’s zero hypocrisy. We can debate whether or not it’s worth requiring that a second round of aid be paid for up front. But Paul so far has acted the same way with the KY relief, as he did for previous votes on disaster relief.
By definition, there no hypocrisy if he follows the same process each time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device