Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
None of them had a plan to get the Vice President to ignore his constitutional duties, nor did they abdicate their own duties.
If you look at the 2016 election, Never Trumpers were a significant force in pressuring electors to not vote for Trump.
Many of the reasons for doing so have since proven to be valid.
There is no valid whatabout.
|
Ok. So this is what you're saying...
If you lose a presidential election, it's OK with you to try and overturn the results using any method possible, other than getting the VP to do it.
So according to you, if you lose an election...
it's OK if you pressure the electors to not cast their votes for the winner, for no reason other than you hate the guy who won fair and square.
it's OK if your congressmen challenge the results in states, for no reason other, than you hate the guy who won fair and square.
But, if you pressure your VP to forego his duties in order to overturn an election, THEN it's bad.
All other ways to overturn an election for no good reason (other than you lost and can't accept it) are acceptable to you, except the method Trump selected.
Do you seriously expect any sane person to buy that, Pete?