so we have spence saying it’s not “overturning an election” if they try to install someone other than the winner from the same party as the winner.
wayne says that describing someone’s actions as “acting like a spoiled brat who is willing to undermine the constitution” is actually an endorsement of what they did, not a criticism of what they did.
and pete says it’s ok to make
multiple attempts to overturn an election, as long as you don’t involve the vice president. only if the VP is part of the plan, is it a bad plan.
whew.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|