Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
NM
|
"So I should pay taxes for schools but people who want to attend a private school should be subsidized by me also? Will those same families subsidize my gold membership or gym memborship?"
You're paying taxes to send Hartford kids to crappy Hartford schools. You're paying anyway. Is it better for those kids for you to pay (and it's usually cheaper by the way) for them to go to a goos catholic school somewhere? I'm not saying raise your taxes to pay for that. I'm saying, instead of paying $19,000 a year to send those kids to lousy Hartford public schools, why not pay $5k a year to send them to a terrific catholic school (my little guys go to a catholic middle school, price tag is $5k a year). Not suggesting any new taxes, just diverting a portion of what we're already paying, to deliver a far superior product to kids who need it.
I think choice is a terrific idea. You'd rather doom those kids to failing sh*thole schools to make a political statement.
"Can you pls. show me an ad or a statement by any D. who has said we'll give you more cash if just have more babies? Bc I don't think that has ever been said."
Maybe it's never been said, but that's what welfare does. People on the take, figure it out. That's what the programs do. And the obvious side effect, is creating more fatherless kids.
Do you deny that welfare programs do this?
"Bc the know that didn't do much for "black unemployment"
Oh. So democrats only stand when the president is single-handedly responsible for the good result".
When Biden brags at his first SOTU about all the jobs created, will the democrats cheer? Did he personally create all those jobs? Or was the economy opening back up again before he was sworn in? Same with the stock market.
"So, no they didn't"
Please give me some meaningful measures by which black life didn't improve under Trump, compared to Obama.
We all know you guys all hate that blacks did well under Trump. But just because you can't stand it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.