02-18-2022, 01:03 PM
|
#15
|
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,428
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"You’re seriously claiming Tim Apples compensation has no effect on Apples bottom line?"
100M a year, for a $3 trillion company, is nothing.
Like all the good commies here, all you're doing is focusing on his cost. You're assuming he ads zero value.
Look at the stock performance, growth, jobs added, any measure you want. He gets an A+ for his management of Apple.
I doubt most Apple employees want him gone and replaced with a cheaper alternative. If they don't care, no reason for you to care.
|
Oh, okay
In the last 50 years executive and upper level management compensation has increased at a rate much higher than the rate for lower level employees who in many cases have if you account for inflation, lost income even though worker productivity has increased.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|