Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
New York City decides to declare itself a sanctuary city.
Texas says ok, if you want ‘em,,we got plenty of ‘em, so we’ll send you some.
New York City responds by saying the schools cannot accommodate the children of the immigrants, and that teachers shouldn’t bear the burden of federal immigration policy.
So maybe you shouldn’t be a sanctuary city then.
What new yorkers mean is, they want illegals, but not in their city. It’s ok if Texas teachers have to hear the burden, but new yorkers should be absolved of facing consequences of that which they advocate for.
Can’t make this stuff up. I dare you to try.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/nyc-sc...dents-prepared |
You still don’t know what sanctuary city is do you… And clearly don’t understand border states get paid by the Government and their economic model are based in immigration
Only you would be shocked there’s not a lot of extra bi lingual teachers or housing for suddenly available seeing 17,000 asylum seekers have been bused from areas with the infrastructure design for them over the past 70 years
But let’s use people as political pawns. seems they are the only immigrants Republicans find useful
Districts across the country have teacher shortages Not just in NY
Never seen it this bad’: America faces catastrophic teacher shortage
https://www.washingtonpost.com/educa...cher-shortage/
Another outrage story shocking
Jim