View Single Post
Old 02-19-2004, 03:49 PM   #4
Bleedem Quick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cohasset
Posts: 18
Thanks for the clarification.

As I now understand it we need F2F to stop Amendment 13 from closing Stellwagen. Except nobody is currently threatening to close Stellwagen ("threatening" here means legislation or rules are pending). Also, F2F as a state house bill has no impact on Stellwagen.

So we need F2F to keep Waquoit from being closed. Well, where's the pending rule that would close Waquoit or Black's Creek?

We need F2F as a symbol, to encourage the thus-far failed federal F2F. Novel, interesting, but you've had supporters posting maps of 842 square miles of imminent closure.

I have read your links in full, including the Bill Heough editorial you react against on your site. He accuses you of hysteria. I concur.

[gotta run, more later]
Bleedem Quick is offline   Reply With Quote