View Single Post
Old 11-28-2001, 09:39 PM   #28
redcrbbr
here fishy fishy
iTrader: (0)
 
redcrbbr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: westport,ma.
Posts: 3,111
Send a message via ICQ to redcrbbr Send a message via AIM to redcrbbr Send a message via Yahoo to redcrbbr
Thumbs down

No, just don't like the idea. I am however curious as to how much of the funds taken in by the sale of the sweetwater licenses are kept on target. Every spring i see truck loads of trout and salmon getting dumped into Stafford pond in Tiverton. (If i'm not mistaken didn't they shut down stafford pond because of security reasons). I suppose we could look at the past record of how well the state has managed the funds raised from the selling of freshwater, hunting, and trapping licenses. How much of the revenue was actually applied to the intended target. Even if the state has been honorable and honest i still say NO to the saltwater fishing license.

redcrbbr
of all the things i've lost...i miss my mind the most!!

redcrbbr is offline   Reply With Quote