Quote:
Originally posted by basswipe
Ask your self these three questions:Is the WORLD better off without Saddam Hussein?Is the WORLD better off without the Taliban?Will the WORLD be better off without Al-Quada?Answer these questions either yes or no.Not yes or no with an explanation just simply yes or no.I'll bet you can't.THE ONLY answers I should see is: yes/no...yes/no...yes/no.But that ain't gonna happen because you can't answer without explaining yourself.
|
That's because they arn't the questions you should be asking. They are loaded questions to distract you from reality.
How about, should you go to war unprepared?
The President is holding course in Iraq because he doesn't want to look weak, and it's killing our guys. There is now a clear consensus that we do not have the troops in Iraq to get the job done. It's also clear that Bush has been misleading the American people on what's really going on there.
This is exactly what happened in Vietnam.
Chief, the greatist respect we can show for our troops is to recognize our faults and give them what they need to complete the mission. To continue with Bush's course of action is only going to make matters worse, and according to our own NIC could lead very soon to civil war.
Bush says Iraq is central to the war on terror. If that's the case the war on terror isn't going very well at all.
We need new leadership, and fast.
-spence