View Single Post
Old 10-04-2004, 11:59 AM   #6
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
Skip, Bush ignored Generals who said we needed twice the troops to get the job done.

In the 1990's congress spent tens of millions researching what a post Saddam would look like, this work was completely ignored.

An intelligence report written just before the war predicted Iraq would become very unstable if Saddam was removed, it was ignored.

The Administration's only response to this is that they didn't think they needed a post-war plan because we would be greeted as liberators and Iraq would just be safe and happy.

2300 attacks last month and Bush maintains things aren't that bad in Iraq.

The only thing that's consistant between then and now is the lack of truth flowing from the President's lips

-spence
spence is offline   Reply With Quote