View Single Post
Old 05-03-2005, 12:13 PM   #7
outfished
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
outfished's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Outer Banks of Framingham
Posts: 434
Mass Audubon and the such would rather protect wildlife at all cost than manage it in a scientifically proven way. I've seen deer on those properties and wouldn't hunt them even if I was given the chance. Wildlife that is not managed properly can and does become a disaster very quickly, just look at the beaver, skunk, coyote and fox population explosion in Mass. It's a freakin nightmare! The Audubon society is far removed from what John James Audubon had invisioned. He was a woodsman, hunter and artist(who also killed the birds he drew). Just before the anti-trapping laws were initiated, I was a member of Ma. Audubon as well as a member of the Appalachian Mountain Club that both pushed the issue ahead. I asked that my opinions be printed in their op-ed sections of their publications, for I thought these measures would be both unsafe and unwise. I was immediatelty denied and I revoked my memberships with both organizations. You may not all agree with trapping but some folks still trap for supplementing their incomes as well as feeding their families, Its a long time honored tradition. IMO it's just a start for these folks to eventually force no hunting laws across the country and yes, fishing is also a target for them. They may not be as extreme or radical as PETA but they're not far behind. Have you noticed how these groups are joining together to get a bigger "bang" for their buck? If anyone of us honestly think that groups such as these are here to manage animal populations, you are gravely mistaken.
outfished is offline   Reply With Quote