View Single Post
Old 07-29-2005, 10:38 AM   #11
Iwannakeeper
fishing the pacific
iTrader: (0)
 
Iwannakeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Posts: 993
Send a message via AIM to Iwannakeeper
Quote:
Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
You know its fine to take a fish now and then to eat at 28 inches however I see to many people stretch a 27-1/2 to a 28 and justify taking it, I would rather them stretch a 35 to a 36. Its the mentality of it that I see, they take the 28s just to say they have a "keeper" not with the thought of a meal.

The problem is that people are taking fish home to show off and not eat or sell.

As someone pointed out (eben I think) the 28in fish is enough for a meal or two and is safer (from a toxin level). I perfer to keep a small fish once in awhile for a meal or two. I do not take fish to stock freezer.

I hope the length limits do not drop. I do not know enough to decide whether they should go up.

I do like the idea of a small (28-36") and a large (over 44") so that you can have table fare and still keep a trophy if you are lucky enough.

But the bait fish demise makes the most logical sense to me. If there is not enough bait to supply the predators, there are no predators. and the predators that are left are smaller, undersized, and not as healthy.

-IWK

Keep lines wet and tight in the pacific
Iwannakeeper is offline   Reply With Quote