View Single Post
Old 01-15-2006, 02:36 PM   #64
MoroneSaxatilis
googan
iTrader: (0)
 
MoroneSaxatilis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Googanville
Posts: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike
According to the original posting: "At a November 9, 2005business meeting, the Marine Fisheries Advisory Commission (MFAC) approved several Division of Marine Fisheries (MarineFisheries) proposals including a two-year seasonal cod prohibition in a portion of Massachusetts Bay and a three-year moratorium on the harvest, possession, and sale of river herring."

If that wording is correct, the indians won't have any shops to sell to.
Exactly.
There have been several herring management/ban threads posted over the last couple of months, and in every one, someone mentions that people from a state with a ban will take herring in a state that doesn't have one, or mentions the Native American Indian exemption issue. What sometimes seems to be missed is the fact that even if a person obtains herring legally in one state, it would still be illegal to possess that fish in a state With a ban. I think one problem is that poachers, by thier very nature, ignore/violate bans, laws, rules, and regs, and are willing to do things like take herring illegally, or possess short scup in the livewell. I will certainly obey any and all such regs, first, because I don't want to face the consequences, but also because it should improve the resource down the road.

MoroneSaxatilis is offline   Reply With Quote