View Single Post
Old 01-23-2006, 07:16 PM   #2
MoroneSaxatilis
googan
iTrader: (0)
 
MoroneSaxatilis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Googanville
Posts: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bass Babe
Apparently congress passed some serious budget cuts in the way of commercial fisheries observing about a month ago. I haven't found out too many of the details, except that it's put me out of my dream job. To the supermarket I go, to work until enough people leave the job I'm now waiting indefinitely for.

Now, I don't see how huge cuts help at all. They require a reduction in the days observing. This stuff is important in order to calculate commercial fishing pressure and to find ways to reduce bycatch. You need a certain sample size in order to get accurate results. The government will end up expending more money subsidizing commercial vessel owners and paying out welfare, unemployment, etc., when fish stocks are not properly managed.

I'm in the process of checking up on the details of these cuts and who to contact to, well, I guess, complain. The severe reduction in the observing budget and, therefore research days at sea may end up affecting striper numbers, as well as all other fish. I urge you to contact your senators, reps, and local, regional, and national fishery management agencies in order to let them know how important commercial fisheries observing is to us, to fish stocks, to commercial fishermen, and to aquatic ecosystems. Increase the budget, dudes!
This is very interesting, because the boat owner(s) and crew PAY to have observers onboard. It's been my understanding the money we pay goes directly to AIS, who then distribute a portion of that money to the observer.
Does this amount not cover all expenses and the rest is paid by govt?

MoroneSaxatilis is offline   Reply With Quote