View Single Post
Old 05-12-2006, 11:37 PM   #19
CaptDom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by basswipe
Cap you either gotta be a salesman for Anderson or a stock holder in the company.You're WAY to defensive over these fish.Your life doesn't depend on these fish does it?

I'm done with this thread.Time to head BACK out and get MORE bass.
Actually I am the RI distributor for these if the RI DEM decides to lift their ban. My life doesn't depend on it, but I obviously have interests in it. I live on Aquidneck Island, and fish the same waters as you on a daily basis throughout the year. I also hold a Biology degree, and run a charter outfit as well. I am merely trying to educate the public when it puts forth misinformation and conjecture. It is natural for anyone with a vested interst whether it be economic, emotional, or otherwise to defend something that is important to them. I have done major research over the last year and a half, and spent alot of time and energy working within the guidelines of the RI general laws to insure this fish was safe and legal. I care very much about our resources here, as my livelihood depends on a healthy and diverse coastal watershed. Without it I would be out of work. I would certainly not jeapordize it in any way, and in my very informed opinion this fish can only help take the pressure off the herring, menhaden, and eel stocks while presenting no threat to the "native species"( Many of which were not indigenous but are now referred to as native, i.e largemouth bass). Not to mention make me a bit of much needed money.

PS, I had bass up to 18 pounds in the bay the last 3 days. Our charter on Thur. had over 130 bass to the boat, 29 of them keepers. Many were caught on the Black Salty.

Last edited by CaptDom; 05-12-2006 at 11:52 PM..
CaptDom is offline   Reply With Quote