View Single Post
Old 11-06-2006, 08:34 AM   #7
wheresmy50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by afterhours View Post
i've always considered them as cowards, with their use of women and children as shields and their "war" on civilian populace. not to mention the killing and torturing of their own- 'effin cowardly barbarians at best.
I saw an interview once with the guys involved in the "Black Hawk Down" incident. The one guy was saying that the Somali men would send women or children out into the street to get a weapon from someone who had been hit; the men would also literally use the women as shields as they shot at the Americans. The Ranger went on to say that however unfortunate, they all realized that to get out of there alive, they had to consider anyone with a gun or being used as a shield as much of a threat as the men.

I completely agree that this is dispicable.

With that said, I don't think George Patton would have had the same problems if 50 Arabs in North Africa would have run into a Mosque. I can't see him wrapped up in some ethical dilemma - the Mosque would have just disappeared. What did Von Clausewitz say about limited war?
wheresmy50 is offline   Reply With Quote