View Single Post
Old 12-08-2006, 02:13 PM   #16
ThrowingTimber
It's about respect baby!
iTrader: (0)
 
ThrowingTimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ri
Posts: 6,358
Blog Entries: 1
I wont even bother giving a theory too much thought, that doesnt account for losses.

So if in 1989 there were x amount of yoy, and they should be x length and weight by x year.

Where are the losses factored in?

I like the theory dont get me wrong just trying to bring up another point of view. Its almost like an IF nothing goes wrong with these fish theory?

Factor in a few metric tons of lost fish for the nets off nc and I'd be more onboard with the theory.

Domination takes full concentration..
ThrowingTimber is offline   Reply With Quote