View Single Post
Old 01-30-2007, 10:44 AM   #100
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by goosefish View Post
Holy mossbunker!

Resources should be managed not individually but ecologically. It is the future to a sustainable planet. The relationship of one thing to another. Whatever we can do to improve the productivity of our estuaries is, I think, a good thing. Oysters and pogies and eel grass. The Trinity. Pass the hot sauce, please.
Amen brother goosefish!
Ecosystem based management is the key.
It does start from the ground up.

Damn this thread exploded!!!
Everybody take a DEEP breath, relax and realzie that ultimatly we are all on the same side (the bass) ...

As the great philosofer Bob Dylan said
"We always did feel the same,
We just saw it from a different point of view,
Clammer's Tangled up in blues." (OK. added a bit )"


What I would like to see:
Numbers (#pounds Ark takes/yr) vs. the total catch coastwide
Would they still be scarfing them up outside the bay, before they get to RI? Probably unless more wide reaching legislation is passed. This would be a good step though.

Everyone is probably right to some extent:
The structure of fish would change in the surf and in the bay. They'd be around but maybe have different patterns, maybe not.
large schools of pogies in the bay would make bass an easier target for commercial and recreational fisherman no doubt..



When I was a kid it was the moratorium, but I remember Newport harbor LOADED with adult pogies and monster bluefish all summer. Was it a good thing? Of course. With the population of bass back up it should be a benefit, especially in the bay.

Lets be honest; in the context of Narragansett bay pogies would be a good thing, but what I'm curious is how much of a drop in the bucket is it coastwide. (Ark is potatoes next to Omega protein). we need healthy stocks of bait fish throughout the range of the bass. With out that any benefit will probably be localized in my opinion.

I've heard rumblings from biologists who would never want to be quoted, that the bay may not handle the large population of pogies from decades ago because improved water quality has decreased some of the nutrients (algae) in the bay.. go figure...

Last edited by RIROCKHOUND; 01-30-2007 at 10:50 AM..

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline   Reply With Quote