Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
As far as the Nat'l Geo article. they have a reputation, but they are not a peer reviewed unreproachable (to use Joe's word) reference. Their job is to sell issues first, sell topics second. I think the article has a lot of merit of truth, in the way that Inconvenient truth does; it shed light but I think in a alarmist way.
|
Someone needs to light a fire under your collective a#@es.
Isn't the job of The Fisherman to sell issues first and sell topics second also?
If you somehow think that fisheries are 'not that bad' then you've got blinders on.