Quote:
Originally Posted by pmueller
[Clemens has himself, and Canseco about one thing a stinkin' BBQ. And Roger has changed his testimony on that one within THESE very proceedings. Before the break he said that he was never there.
After the break, he said that he may have stopped by to drop of his wife, his kids, his nanny?? Which one is it, LIAR??
|
There's so much said about the BBQ.
Other than credability, why is the BBQ so important?[/QUOTE]
It's not. In a court of law it would be called a "collateral issue", one that isn't even pertinent to the case. If Clemens was found to have lied about being there, he couldn't even be prosecuted for perjury because the lie is not about a "material fact"
When I turned the radio on to drive to the Fall River courthouse, the first question I heard was, "Mr. Clemens do you suffer from anemia" as one guy grilled him about all of the legitimate medical uses for B-12
That one guy really got in his face about his ridiculous "it was B-12 and my momma told me it was good for me"
