Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
I've suggested, this is about ideaology, not affiliation, some of you only pick out the parts that you want, then attack with , McCain is going to enjoy huge support from dems that realize that their party is swung so far to the left that they hardly recognize it,
|
The Dem party is no further to the left than it was under Clinton. You're just regurgitating talking points meant to associate anti-Bush rhetoric with the mainstream. Rhetoric that's shared in a less virul way by many if not most independent voters as it's rooted in very real incompetent and corrupt policy decisions.
Quote:
one party stands for, is currently guided by Marxist principles of massive dependence on government, they've never made it as clear as they do now, I believe that this is in direct opposition with the prnciples that this country was founded on and that it is UN-AMERICAN...
|
"One party" huh?
This assertion, which I might add seems to be the bedrock of your entire argument is simply just wrong.
Both parties behave in a manner that inflates the size of government, but only one party is honest about it. The Republicans who have controled the House and Executive Office for the good part of the last 14 years have done little to seek guidance from the founding fathers and instead have made corporations dependent on the teets government, all in the name of shareholder value. The net is a middle class subsidizing 100 Million dollar paydays for the priveleged few.
Quote:
YQUOTEEAH, BUT SCOTT...BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED, PATRIOT ACT TOOK AWAY MY FREEDOM"....shut the f#%$ up...name one liberty or freedom that any one of you has actually lost under the partiot act....
|
What a hypocritical thing to say. Go read your own posts and reevaulate this statement.
Quote:
still waiting for anyone to name one or two of histories great Marxists and their benevolent contributions to our world
|
By your definition I'd thankfully add FDR to the list.
-spence