Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit
Problem is the average American is uninformed, and dosen't have time to really pay attention to everything going on. Too busy trying to survive.
Politicians drive home on the hot button issues because they know and depend on most only reading a headline or two, and the short memories of most.
|
Not being informed is not an excuse. If you are uninformed, then you shouldn't vote - period. The last thing we want are people voting that can't put aside enough time to evaluate the positions of each candidate, their stance on certain policies and form an educated opinion. Everything needed to be educated on an election can be read within an hour or two per week of the campaign. All the other crap is just there so a bunch of fisherman can post on a forum about how they didn't like a candidates haircut that day.
I refuse to believe that the average American does not have 2 hours per week to evaluate the candidates that lead this country. And if they can't, then the responsible thing for them to do is not show up at the polls.
After the Presidential Election, there was an interesting exit poll that I read about. These people went to various polls and asked some of the usually questions -who'd you vote for, what's your party, etc - but they also asked questions like:
"Who was the opponent of the candidate you voted for?"
"What is the name of the Vice President you voted for?"
and many other questions like that.
Can you believe that up to 5-10% of people who entered the polls could not answer the above questions and questions similar? Not to mention this was an extremely small scale, regional exit poll. I wonder what the numbers would look like nation-wide.
Now, take into consideration the winning margin of both Bush's victories and Obama's victory - all 3 of which had popular vote differences <10%.