Quote:
Originally Posted by wheresmy50
I can answer that. Intentionally gut hooking a fish is wrong.
Zero tolerance laws are stupid and don't work. Life is grey. You're not supposed to kill short bass. If you accidentally kill it, the damage is done. What happens after it's dead is irrelevant. I'm not a fish doctor so I can't tell how much blood loss or tissue damage will kill a fish, so if it's bleeding but not dead, I'll throw it back.
I'm talking about logic and morality, not the law. The law doesn't make sense. The same fish may or may not be kept at a certain size depending in which state's waters it's swimming.
This is the morality versus legality argument. The two have nothing to do with each other and only intersect occasionally by chance. In 1850 Virginia, slavery was legal. That doesn't make it moral.
Plus in this case the stakes are so small, doing what's right is relatively risk free. It's not like they actually enforce saltwater fishing regulations.
|
comparing the fishing laws to slavery and the holocaust is pretty ridiculous.
and while i agree if the fish is dead it really doesn't matter. the point of not being able to keep them no matter what is there is absolutely no way to prove that it died by chance, and not on purpose. any one can catch a short throw it a cooler and claim it died from a gut hook.
as far as state to state laws.. thats not a morality issue. it is more of a common sense issues though. since having different sizes and rules seems pointless. how ever those are the rules the states put in place to protect the fish stocks. and are the sizes and rules each state felt best handled that. they should how ever all get together and work out standardized laws. that would make much more sense.
not too mention the laws are there for a reason. because morality can NOT be counted on to govern a democratic society. what some find immoral, other have have absolutely no problem with. especially in a country founded upon freedom of religion. do you have any ideas how many conflicting religious morals are out there? many that are even unconstitutional. let alone illegal. on top of that everyone has their own person moral agenda. if left up to governing based upon morality, this country would be doomed. it would be a non stop religious battle over which morals are the right morals. (not that it isn't now) and i'm sorry to say, but i am not about to let some one else's moral convictions dictate the things i can do in my every day life. (granted a lot of laws already do that)