View Single Post
Old 11-10-2009, 09:41 AM   #50
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD View Post
scottw has the mentality of "either you agree with what I say, or you're some crazy liberal idiot that hates America." not true The crazy thing for him is that nothing about this topic has anything to do with a person's political ideology. actually Hasan expressed his political and religeous views quite loudly and they were intertwined... But, take away partisanship, and he doesn't know how to be critical of someone so he blindly falls back to the only thing he knows - "They must have this view because they're liberals". an essential ingredient to liberalism is non-judmentalism, open mindedness and tolerance ...even if it gets someone killed...

The terrorist reference is only being made because he's Muslim. no, it's being made because he was demonstrably a radical muslim and shouted Allah Akbar and then gunned down 40+ innocent people Even the federal investigators are stating they believe this was him acting alone and motivated by him being deployed soon. Weird, *motivated by him being deployed soon* doesn't sound like "motivated to incite fear or influence government" to me.funny, if you listen to any of the accounts of his rantings this is exactly what he was ranting about

Now, I'm curious what other non-facts will be used to continue scottw and buckman's unsupportable argument.
hold on...I get it...there is no terrorism any more...this was a "man caused disaster"...as Chris Matthews said.."it's not against the law to call Al Qaieda"...poor guy, hope he gets some treatment and can resume his life as soon as possible, the Army probably just put too much stress on him and his peers were probably always teasing him because he was a Muslin, those intolerant bastards...it's all their fault..

you are scaring me...
scottw is offline