View Single Post
Old 03-10-2010, 11:53 AM   #11
InTheHole
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
InTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 540
It was a cheap shot hit, blind side, unprotected, shoulder, elbow... whatever. There is a rule 21(i) that covers intent to injure and lists it as a match penalty. By going after the head of a player not in a position to see the check coming and able to defend, instead of taking the easily available full body check... I don't see how that can be seen as anything but intent to injure.
If that had been Thornton on Crosby the NHL would be nailing the cross together for the crucifixion

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day ...
show him where to fish and ... you'll be sorry
InTheHole is offline   Reply With Quote