View Single Post
Old 01-15-2011, 04:36 PM   #1
Swimmer
Retired Surfer
iTrader: (0)
 
Swimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sunset Grill
Posts: 9,511
Without a doubt the right verdict. Never should have been charged. The DA who tried the case said he didn't charge the father because he had been through enough, bullchit. Thats nothing but covering the fathers crimes. The father saw the advertisment, brought his kid there, signed the form, stood only a few feet away and first had his other son shoot, then the younger boy. Its not like the Fleury guy who organized it said to the father hey bring your kid to the gun shoot, I want to place him in danger, the father did that all by himself. Its class based prosecution. The da considers himself a proffessional equal with the doctor and looks down on the ex-chief. Either that the DA got phone calls at home about who to prosecute and who not to. That jury whould have only had lunch, taken a vote and went home. Short day, no doubt. Now maybe the other two people charged wont be prosecuted any further. And besdies, at a private range, where one has paid to attend and event, making himself a range member for the day, makes it perfectly legal for that person to shoot any GD weapon thats there. The DA was trying create new laws.

No one will ever be able to tell me that the DA didn't have open conversation with his staff and politicaL SUPPORTERS OVER WHETHER THERE WILL BE A STORM, HORNETS NEST, in the papers about not charging the father and whether or not he will survive the storm.

Last edited by Swimmer; 01-18-2011 at 01:02 PM..

Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MA
Serial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
Swimmer is offline   Reply With Quote