Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFish
Thats your definition Mike! Mine is to be a dominant contender, to be a perennial playoff team and to appear pretty darn regularly in the Superbowl (does not have to be in a row) and the Pats have done all that! Did the Cowboys or the Steelers do it much differently than the Patriots during the decades they dominated?? No they did not. So I think we can agree...to disagree. In my opinion they are a Dynasty in every sense of the word. Show me where it needs to be consecutive Championship appearances?? As for the Bills???? Pa-leeez.....you can't be a Dynasty if you have never won the brass ring Mike!! 3 Superbowl wins in a 10 year stretch makes it as far as I am concerned. Not to mention to be a dominant as they have been.
|
You're as bad as those Yankee fans who kept on with that stupid "26 and counting" routine when they went 10 years between WS wins.
Sure, they won 3 in 4 years too at the end of the last decade---but by 2004 that dynasty was cooked, even though they contended every year in between.