Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Specialist, can you elaoborate on who is starting "with zero"? EVERYONE starts with $0. That's what happens when you "start". Not sure what you mean by "making them whole". You get "made whole" by socking away enough of your own money to fund your own retirement. That's what most adults are expected to do in th ereal world, so I see no reason why union folk cannot get on board.
You are trying to refute my healthcare opinion by suggesting that some people get 100% of their healthcare paid for? Specialist, you cannot manage to such a rare exception. Some people also win the lottery, but that's not a viable strategy for the majority of us. When I say "all", can we assume that if I'm right for 98% of the group, that's close enough? Nit-picking isn't debate. I guess when you know you don't have facts or common sense that can justify the cost of the benefits, all you can do is dodge and dodge and dodge...
|
New employees start with zero that is fine, but what would you do with current tenured employees? You are stating take away their pensions and start them with zero? I am saying based on years of service give them a lumpsum into a 401k plan to equal what they would earn if you freeze their pensions today. Then all pesions would be null and void. All most everyone would be happy clams. The taxpayers because there would be no more pensions, and the people who would lose them would be bought out of them and given a substantial start to their 401k.
If your employer came to you tomorrow and said, "Jim business is down and I can no longer contribute to your 401k, and any contributions I have already made I will be taking back." Would you be ok with that?