Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
It's not even close. Scalia knows what he's getting into and knows exactly what the heckers are after. Rush's attack was extremely personal and cruel.
Do you realize that whenever you want to make something up you state it as a "refusal" by someone else?
I have the paper...it proves that college students of all inclination will do stupid things. Always have and always will, it's part of growing up.
To claim this is somehow evidence a "liberal" condition is silly.
It is ALL about women's health and equal treatment under the law. You are aware that religious institutions must abide by laws right?
No, he said tea-bagger because it's funny that someone in the tea-party called themselves that and he knows it goes right up your a$$ 
-spence |
"Scalia knows what he's getting into and knows exactly what the heckers are after"
OK. Using your logic, Ms Fluke is a self-described women's reproductive rights activist, so why didn't she know what she was getting into. She got into Georgetown Law, so she's obviously very bright. Why do you assume she was innocent, naive little waif? because it makes my side look bad, that's why...
"To claim this is somehow evidence a "liberal" condition is silly."
Please show me proof of consrvetive college students throwing condoms at an invited liberal guest. The left has an ALMOST (not quite) monopoly on this type of behavior Spence. You almost never hear of right-wing riots. Anarchy is the method of liberals, not conservatives.
"It is ALL about women's health and equal treatment under the law. You are aware that religious institutions must abide by laws right?"
Not if those laws prohibit the church from pursuing their beliefs. Have you even read the first amendment? Do you ever get one right, even by accident? Read this please, from the first amendment...
"prohibits the federal and state governments from establishing an official religion,
or from favoring or disfavoring one view of religion over another."
The church isn't interfering with women's health. The church isn't telling these women that they cannot use condoms, the church is just saying that the church doesn't want to provide them. A small number of women need birth control pills for true medical needs (my wife is one of them). In the vast majority of cases, contraception is a tool to engage in casual sex, and thus not anything remotely resembling "medicine".
Spence, if I buy a gun, it's in everyone's interest for me to attend a gun safety class. But I can't force my employer to pay for it. If I choose to get involved with guns, that's my choice, and thus my responsibiolity to ensure I do it safely. I have no right to ask anyone else to pay for it. Similarly, if I want to get involved in casual sex, by what right to I take your money out of your pocket to buy my condoms with? Putting aside women who have legitimate medical needs, which is a very small minority.