Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Repubs. are now coming out against renewing the Violence Against Women Act.
"Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska sternly warned her colleagues that the party was at risk of being successfully painted as antiwoman — with potentially grievous political consequences in the fall, several Republican senators said Wednesday."
If 1% of independents switch sides b/c of this war on woman, the Repubs are toast.
|
Zimmy, who are the nutjobs on this issue?
My side says that if women need contraception for legitimate medical reasons, they will provide it. But the church will not pay for the tools for folks to engage in casual sex.
Your side says that's not good enough. Your side says that somehow (no one can tell me what the logic is) that employers are obligated to pay for the means to engage in voluntary, casual, recreational sex.
The poll I shared shows tht a huge majority of Americans are on my side, not your side. So who are the "nut jobs:"?
Zimmy, Spence, Paul S...anyone...where does it say that employers shuold make it easier for their employees to have casual sex? Why stop at condoms? Why not force the Catholic church to provide employees with rooms with mirrors on the ceilings, vibrating beds, and Barry White music in the background?
"If 1% of independents switch sides b/c of this war on woman, the Repubs are toast"
And if 1% of Catholics make the opposite switch because we don't like having our rights trampled upon, the liberals are toast.
You cannot say it's about healthcare. This is about liberals wanting others to pay for them to have casual sex. Maybe a majority of Americans support that, I don't know. But let's at least frame the question honestly, is that too much to ask?
War on women...not according to the NY Times poll...