Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl F
Promised over and over, all historic use by people, fishing, hunting, gathering of beach plums and rose hips, walking, swimming, not to be changed... OK.. sure.. the boids and MA audubomb changed all that chit.. when they led Mrs. Tasha away in cuffs for doing something she always did, was the canary in the coal mine...
George Price.. well.. can't say it in writing..but you know what I mean
yes the fencing is very symbolic..because most of the time, there is NOTHING, inside the fence.. the birders version of the shell game..and the head Bureaucrat Puppet, follows along very well
truth be told..we are all "Symbolically Fenced OUT"
also, truth be told.. it's only gonna get worse....Old goat, and 2na.. look at what has been taken away, and what's left.. they already have over 90 %.... what, is truly left, and for what small amount of time are we allowed to even see it?
National PARK?.. try National Bird Sanctuary.. it will be renamed...
|
it sucks they have all kinds of money to fund their rediculous fight,
But if that is so about the historic use not to be changed, I think it's high time somehow this crap gets challenged. I'm not rich or smart but why can't we get a judge to see this the way it was written and see this bull crap symbloic fencing is just a ploy
