Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
No, no. You said it was "his job" to stay in the car. That's what you said, and it's B.S.
|
No, it's clearly spelled out in the community watch rules that Zimmerman was supposed to be following. As the chief of the neighborhood watch you'd think he'd know them better than anyone.
Quote:
10. Remember always that your responsibility is to report crime. Do not take any risks to prevent a crime or try to make an arrest. The responsibility for apprehending criminals belongs to the police department.
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigati...amHandbook.pdf
|
I haven't seen anything that indicates Zimmerman didn't cross this line completely on his own judgement.
Quote:
|
I also suspect he's probably going to be convicted of a lesser charge, mostly to keep the anarchists on your side of the aisle from burning the state of Florida to the ground, which they have a tendency to do when things don't go their way. Especially when your leaders like Al Sharpton get all the morons good and worked up over a bunch of lies.
|
Al Sharpton doesn't really have anything to do with this case. It's a deke by some to distract from the substance of this issue.
I think it's going to boil down to two simple things, Martin had every right to be where he was, and Zimmerman crossed the line in his duty in the neighborhood watch by moving beyond simply reporting what he saw as suspicious behavior and by carrying a firearm when he wasn't supposed to be.
If Martin was indeed profiled -- the reporting is that there have been many thefts by young black men recently -- then the issue of Zimmerman crossing the vigilante line is even more important.
Most of the support for Zimmerman appears to be coming from the gun lobby...who's position is just as absurd as Al Sharpton.
-spence