Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
But you keep dismissing the fact (gee, I wonder why) that a much larger percentage of Republicans voted for the bill, than Democrats.
|
Actually I gave a very clear and reasoned explanation.
Quote:
Again, in typical liberal fashion, you assume blacks should support homosexuals because they too were discriminated against. Blacks don't see it that way, no matter how many times you look down your noses at them condescendingly, and smugly suggest otherwise.
|
Actually, the article points out that black leaders use the same biblical approach to condemn homosexuality as were used to promote slavery.
This is very interesting no?
Quote:
Ahhh. So you are implying that Republicans aren't interested in bipartisanship anymore. Interesting. Spence, do me a favor, look back, and see who has been bi-oartisan with Supreme Court nominees, and which party is obstructionist? Republicans routinely confirm the most liberal justices nominated by Democrats (the voted to confirm Sotomayor and Ginsburg, for example). Remember what happened to Bush's nominee, Robert Bork. The Democrat refusal to confirm Bork was so partisan and unprecedented, it gave way to a new term, called "Borking". Bork, as an appellate judge, had never been overturned by a higher court. His confirmation was denied by Democrats. Sotomayor had been overturned many times, and she was confirmed. Interesting, if your mind isn't so closed off that you have to stick your head in the sand because it makes your side look reprehensible.
|
Here you go again...taking something tangent to the conversation just to attempt a point nobody even asked you to make.
Sotomayor managed to get 9 Republican votes...and you're citing this as a bi-partisan accomplishment?
Wow.
As for real bi-partisan legislation, right now I don't believe it's possible unless perhaps it was related to national defense.
Quote:
Again Spence, I know you want to believe that Democrats are always compromising, and that Republicans are always obstructing. If you could prove that, I'd support your assertion. But once again, you cannot.
|
I never claimed democrats were always compromising.
-spence