Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
You said he was not irrational. You agreed that calling servicemen heroes could be construed as supporting the war (in other words, you claim his premise is not without merit). You said you could see why a liberal might think like he does.
|
I said his comments were not irrational for an anti-war liberal to make. That is not a de facto endorsement, far from it, it's simply a reasoned observation.
Look, many people believe we've become a society desensitized to war and that a military industrial complex has too much influence on our government. The combination of factors some would argue leads to perpetual war...
I've mentioned in past threads an interesting book that discusses some aspects of this by Andrew Bacevich (The New American Militarism) a self described Catholic Conservative who fought in Vietnam, was an Army Colonel and lost his own son in Iraq in 2007.
The point being that these ideas don't exist in a black and white world. The difference though between someone like Bacevich and Hayes is that while they may have similar opinions (i.e. opposition to the Iraq War) one has real world experience while the other is simply an academic. As such there are lessons that are not fully learned. Hayes in his remarks isn't calculating enough of the the up front human cost (i.e. I'm signing a blank check to the US Govt) so he's being quite insensitive and hence is wrong or so I believe.
But to write off his behavior as a mental issue is also reckless. If the lessons of Vietnam have not been fully learned...castigating people like Hayes isn't the way to move forward.
Personally, I think Chris Hayes had his own "teaching moment" right before the camera.
-spence