Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Bingo. Spence, read this post. The details of the operation have nothing to do with the contempt vote. The strong possibility that Holder lied, regardless of the subject matter, is what prompted the vote.
Spence, what's your snarky comeback to that? That I'm a racist?
|
There's a big difference between possibility and actual perjury. I've yet to see any evidence that Holder did lie. Just that the information was out there and he could have known about it.
The evidence right now seems to indicate that Holder should have known about it but not that he did know about it. Holding someone in contempt is a pretty serious thing you don't just do for the heck of it. If they don't have the evidence then why do it? Oh yea, politics...
-spence