08-31-2012, 07:39 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"
Like cutting the deficit in half, (...as a result of his policies. As I stated, he was wrong about the results)
closing Gitmo, ( he changed his mind? That is different than putting out a plan, as Ryan did, then distort what the plan actually does. Keeping it open is also another thing that the Republicans agree with . Maybe it was a concession to them??? )
not raising taxes on anyone making less than $250k ( details???. Are you talking about tanning beds, cigarettes? ) , transparency ( ok, got me there), and my favorite, that he would "change" DC and be the one to bring us together ( yeah, go back to the McConnell statement and ask how you bring us together when that is what he has to work with)...
Did Ryan lie about his stance on Simpson-Bowles? ( no, but he chastises Obama as if he thinks Obama was wrong, even though he agrees with Obama's stance. That is crazy. )
"everyone will benefit from the incredible investment that results from the wealthiest Americans investing in business."
Nice liberal bumber-sticker mentality, which unfortunately doesn't match the truth...anyone can invest in the stock market who wishes to. And today, many non-wealthy folks have some stocks and bonds, it's not just for the Rockefellers anymore. (~23% of tax filers have dividend income. The average of those is a few hundred dollars. They would save tens of dollars under the plan. Those $10's of dollars would be eaten up by the increase they pay in taxes to balance the budget. On the other hand, someone like Romney would pay less than 1% tax rate on his almost $80 million in investment income. THAT is the truth. If enough Americans like the plan, fine; Romney would win. Why aren't they honest about it?)
And if those tax rates on dividends are such an offense, pray tell why Obama didn't do somehting about it when the liberals controlled the executive and legislative branch? (Can't answer why it wasn't a priority during those four months when they had the filibuster proof majority; a time when they could have changed it. My guess is that he didn't want to raise those taxes in the very beginning of the recovery, since he said he wouldn't raise taxes on dividends? . In any case, 15% current rate is a bit more than 0% under Ryan.)
|
fdsff
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|