Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
If you diminish the safety net isn't that precisely what would be happening?
Because he was raised a Mormon. I've flown out of Salt Lake and have been surrounded by Mormon's on their way to mission...they were as naive as can be and were doing what they thought their Church expected of them. They were really nice people mind you, I've never met a Mormon I didn't like.
Again, because he's a Mormon and tithing is a part of the church...when you're filthy stinking rich you get to donate more.
The real quest is why didn't he deduct all of it, I mean, that is a test to be a Republican President right?
If he did I'm sure Obama would call it Jihad, right? 
-spence |
"If you diminish the safety net isn't that precisely what would be happening?"
If romney is diminishing the safety net for no valid reason, than yes, you'd have a point.
Spence, you work in finance, right? Are you suggesting that Medicare and Social Security don't need to be "diminished" in order to be saved? If that's what you're saying, please tell me where the $40+ trillion will come from thatthose 2 programs need, if we leave benefits where they are.
Spence, you liberals have to stop these dishinest tactics. Medicare and Social Security will not exist post-baby boomers unless they are either (1) adequately funded, or (2) diminished. And the math shows clearly that we cannot provide promised benefits to all of the Baby Boomers.
Spence, we have serious problems. We don't have any mor etime for the tired liberal tactic of attacking conservatives who are trying to save, not diminish, the safety net.
I await yoru response, which will no doubt include specific details on where ytou are going to find $40 trillion so that we don't have to diminish the safety net...go ahead. either do that, or admit that you are full of sh*t.