Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
They blamed Bush because he personally appointed someone with zero direct experience to head FEMA. Heck of a job Brownie...
Big difference, Obama personally made the call and took accountability for the outcome good or bad.
One was a reactive situation, the other was a proactive situation. They are very different and complex in different ways.
-spence
|
"One was a reactive situation, the other was a proactive situation."
I'm assuming you say Libya was a 'proactive situation'. And in that case, as usual, you are wrong on the facts. The state department (Obama's state dept) decided to pull 2 full security teams out of Libya (12 men each, I believe). The guy in charge of security at the embassy asked the state dept to reconsider, and he pointed to all the recent, documented cases of violence and threats. The state dept (Obama's state dept) was not convinced. You can make a very strong case that 4 superb Americans paid for that stupidity with their lives.
Then, the reaction. Five days afetr the attack, the state dept, the ambassador to the UN, and Jay Carney (Obama's press secretary) said there was no evidence it was anything other than a spontaneous outburst. So I guess Obama believes that protesting students typically carry RPGs, mortars, and mortar tubes in their backpacks?