Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Not until we perfect the Heisenberg compensator.
As we've discussed, there's certainly a decision here to investigate but the actual security requests that were made wouldn't have likely made a difference.
Think of what you're saying here. The US invades a sovereign and mostly friendly country and fires rockets that likely have a high chance of collateral damage and perhaps little impact on the safety of those who may or may not even still be alive.
This isn't that black and white.
-spence
|
"The US invades a sovereign and mostly friendly country..."
The US Embassy is also sovereign territory...sovereign to the US. When an ebmassy is being attacked, you don't have to ask permission to defend it...it's just the same as if our shores had been attacked.
"those who may or may not even still be alive."
Read the other thread I started. We now know that the 2 former Navy SEALs were killed at least 7 hours after the attack started. We know that because they were on the radio, saying that they had a laser sight on the mortar position that was firing at them, asking that a gunship come in and destroy that mortar position. That help never came, even though it was close enough. And those 2 superb Americans were eventually killed by a mortar.
I hope this impacts the election by a couple of points.
God Bless Foxnews, the only station not actively burying this story to try and get that Maoist re-elected.