Quote:
Originally Posted by Piscator
If a woman is raped, she should be able to make the choice not to have the baby. If she chooses to do so, good for her. She is a very strong and brave woman. If she decides not to do so, she should not be ashamed ridiculed etc. etc. don't see where anyone has disagreed with this, it is a special case with difficult circumstances no doubt
From a moral standpoint, I don’t think it should be used as a form of birth control due to negligence etc. but it is in most cases
Funny that a bunch of men are arguing this case. Also ironic that many of these posts point that it’s done out of convenience to the woman, don’t you think the man might be persuading many of those decisions????? It’s a convenience to the woman and most times the man……………………
|
you seem to be stuck on a word, and mixing issues, and creating arguments that don't exist...the first is the issue of life, the second of rape and the third is State's issue vs. Federal...both genders can discuss the issue...Mourdock never stated as far as I'm aware that he'd force anyone to have a child, he was asked about his personal belief and he stated his belief that life is sacred and that we're all created equal endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights the first being LIFE or something psycho like that, he acknowledged the horror of rape and the difficulty weighing that into his beliefs, how many times does this have to be pointed out????? seems like some are determined to take this to an entirely different place...love the name calling and references...that really adds to the discussion