Quote:
Originally Posted by JLH
Why are you changing things around and killing off fish? Your statement was that one dead 40" fish was like killing three 28" fish. The numbers don't support your statement so you start manipulating the inputs?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I didn't manipulate the inputs because the numbers don't support my statement, but I will say it was a mess. I was trying to make a comparison so people can see the impact of removing the big fish. It wasn't valid, but I was starting with numbers that you provided for three fish, which assumed all 28" fish will be female .
Even comparing females to females, my statement is pretty accurate.
Year 1:
3x 28” (10# each) fish produce roughly 2,125,000 eggs
1x 40” (26#) fish produces roughly 1,985,454 eggs
Three 28" females produce on average 7% more eggs than an average 40". But start harvesting and you won't get all females. And the numbers are estimates so that 7% is probably +/- 3%.
This is it for me... I agree my explanation wasn't great and I probably should have said 5 or 6 28" to one 40". Here it is in the most basic form, but including males and females:
A group of six 28" fish (3 males, 3 females) produces about 2 million eggs. A 40" fish, almost certainly female, produces about 2 million eggs.
An average harvest of six 28" fish will remove almost the same number of eggs (~7% more, to be as exact as possible) as removing one 40" fish.
It is even more dramatic if you compare a 24" to a 44".