Thread: NRA
View Single Post
Old 01-18-2013, 12:49 PM   #310
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
funny, I remember how indignant you were then (rightfully so). But now it is ok?

Chelsea Clinton? Any Carter?
Paul, if those 2 htings were identical, I would be guilty of hypocrisy as you suggest. They aren't even close to being identical.

In the current case, the NRA is saying that if it's morally acceptable for Obama's family to enjoy the peace of mind that comes from armed security, then it's morally acceptable for anyone else to come to that same conclusion.

In Palin's case, folks on your side called her daughter a slut, and claimed that her handicapped son was not actualy her son, but rather her grandson. That speculation served no public policy purpose except to attack Palin personally.

Obama's family is not being personally attacked by people sympathetic to the NRA. Not even remotely close.

Apples and oranges. Nice try.

Last edited by Jim in CT; 01-18-2013 at 12:56 PM..
Jim in CT is offline