View Single Post
Old 02-01-2016, 09:30 AM   #106
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
Can someone explain how the video was "edited" in dishonest fashion?

The majority of the controversy surrounding the videos, was the suggestion that PP was taking money for selling baby body parts. Since PP subsequently came out and said that "we will no longer take money in exchange for baby body parts", isn't that a pretty good indication that they were, in fact, previously taking money in exchange for baby body parts? Why would PP announce that they were no longer engaging in an act, if they weren't doing it to begin with?
Jim in CT is offline