View Single Post
Old 11-26-2006, 03:42 PM   #45
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by stripersnipr View Post
The very basis for Rangels proposal is incorrect. His statement that the military disproprtionately consists of those of lower social bearing (Undeducated, poor, and minorities) is completely false.
Actually, Rangel's statements (as he's made them) seem to be supported by Pentagon statistics and non-partisan research done over the past few years.
  • Nearly 1/2 of new recruits came from lower-middle-class to poor households
  • Nearly 2/3 of Army recruits in 2004 came from counties in which median household income is below the U.S. median
  • All of the Army's top 20 counties for recruiting had lower-than-national median incomes, 12 had higher poverty rates, and 16 were non-metropolitan

Source: Washington Post

Put Rangel's comments in this context and it would seem as though his argument is more compelling than you might think.

-spence

Last edited by spence; 11-26-2006 at 03:48 PM.. Reason: spelling
spence is offline