Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
So you tried to post the photo as if Milo posted it, got corrected by john and then switched to
sorry you are not correct I posted a Photo from a news story..
I apologize for misinterpreting your juxtaposition of the photo with the rest of your post. Perhaps, you should have noted, in the first place, that it was not Milo's post? Your text would have been more coherent that way. Perhaps, you can see how a reader could have "interpreted" it the way John and I did?
That's the problem with "interpretation" outside of the text. Similar to the problem of imposing personal opinion on the text of the Constitution.
and then I asked if you support that type of Free speech ... and no answer was given
John asked a question and was answered see how that works
|
I'm going to stick to your text. In the first instance, you asked if I"enjoy calling their insults.. Free speech . . ." In this instance, you say you asked if I support "that type of Free speech. . ." So, unless I'm missing something, or misinterpreting you again, it seems that you have evolved from recognizing their insults merely as free speech, to recognizing it as a "type" of free speech. In the first instance, it was not clear whether you even considered their insults as free speech or merely if I enjoyed calling it free speech.
My answer is that I support free speech. That is supposed to include insults. It's irrelevant if I enjoy it or not. That's the way I see how it works.