Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
I "believe" that bits and pieces of evidence have been found that he had some such weapons and that he had plans, as you say, to restart WMD programs.
|
I don't agree. I've read a ton on the subject and aside from a few random and useless artillery shells we really haven't found squat. The conclusion of the Duelfer Report was that Saddam destroyed his WMD in 1991.
Quote:
|
Of course, "belief" and "substance" are different animals. To say that something is "equally without substance" as comparison to something you "don't believe" is a bit shifty. Nonetheless, I did say, in caps, that there is CONJECTURE that the WMDs were moved to Syria. And those conjectures have not been absolutely disproved. Certainly, no one has an answer to General Sada's claim, in his book "Saddam's Secrets" that the WMDs were moved to Syria.
|
This is the same game Cheney played with the Atta meeting in Prague. That because it hasn't been
disproved it could have happened. This logic runs quite contrary to our own legal system.
To be quite matter of fact, there's really no evidence that supports the assertion. There was evidence of movement of
something to Syria, but that we don't know if WMD were not there isn't evidence that there could have been.
I love how you quote an ex-General -
who's trying to sell books to Americans - about a claim for which there's no evidence...oh quite to the contrary...the evidence gathered indicates there were no WMD to smuggle!
Quote:
|
A western model WOULD be an "Iraq of the people." Spreading democracy, in our own long-term interest, IS the right thing to do.
|
You don't "spread" democracy, it has to be grown from within.
-spence