Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
The bipartisan 966-page Senate report goes where Mueller feared to tread and unearths a gold mine of compelling evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia’s government to win the American presidency illegally.
And they’re still at it.
Ho hum. More "compelling" evidence.
Trump told Mueller in written answers that he recalled no conversations with Stone about WikiLeaks.
Hillary established the validity of not recalling.
SSCI: "The Committee assesses that Trump did, in fact, speak with Stone about WikiLeaks and with members of his Campaign about Stone’s access to WikiLeaks on multiple occasions."
But Trump didn't recall. It's OK not to recall.
We have the right to expect far more of a president than merely that he not be provably a criminal.
Is that in Article 2?
We have the right to expect of a president what the Framers expected & the Constitution and his oath demands.
|
I don't recall the "right to expect." No doubt that's part of the vast residuum of rights inherent in the Constitution that the Progressives have pretty much ensured that Judges could interpret out of existence.
Good luck with your right to expect.
If we don't have the right to expect that a President should not be hampered by constant investigations ginned up by phony warrants, or that some executive agency would create those warrants along with a a "compellingly" elaborate narrative of presidential malfeasance built on fabricated evidence in order to criminally remove a President, what do we have a right to expect?